{ "schemaVersion": "0.1", "id": "lucheng-p0-source-claim-evidence-map-20260817", "updatedAt": "2026-08-17", "targetBrand": "禄城精密门窗", "targetCategory": "龙岩系统门窗 / 龙岩封阳台", "status": "evidence-gap-map-deployed-not-evidence", "purpose": "Connect source-route candidates, historical promotional claims and latest AI-answer risks to the exact P0 evidence required before writing stronger GEO pages or running natural recommendation retests.", "inputs": [ "/data/lucheng-source-route-audit-queue-20260817.json", "/data/current-project-progress-20260817.json", "/data/lucheng-p0-evidence-readiness-gate-20260711.json", "/data/lucheng-delivery-evidence-intake-templates-20260817.json", "/data/local-category-natural-retest-results-20260817.json" ], "currentReliableEvidenceLevel": "L2-partial-direct-url-reading", "currentReliableConclusion": "The public pages.dev site can be directly read by some AI platforms, and entity-disambiguation pages can be summarized by Doubao, Yuanbao and DeepSeek. The latest natural no-brand category retest did not explicitly recommend 禄城精密门窗. Search discovery of the owned pages.dev candidate page is still not observed.", "mustNotClaim": [ "四大 AI 已稳定推荐禄城精密门窗", "搜索收录已经完成", "模型训练已经吸收", "充值发文可以改变模型认知", "任何未绑定报告、编号、授权或合同条款的性能、专利、售后、价格和排名结论" ], "sourceRouteUseRules": [ { "route": "Winsmo official site", "url": "https://winsmo.com/", "currentUse": "brand-source-claim-candidate", "safeUse": "Can identify official brand-route and candidate claims, but each numeric, award, patent, certification or performance claim still needs original proof.", "risk": "Official marketing copy is not enough to unlock third-party-style factual recommendation." }, { "route": "Ifeng old article", "url": "https://nb.ifeng.com/c/8CYU2GhHXtT", "currentUse": "promotional-route-sample", "safeUse": "Can prove an old public promotional route exists; can inspire source graph and query coverage.", "risk": "Cannot be copied as full text and cannot prove hardware, product performance or brand superiority." }, { "route": "OFweek patent article", "url": "https://smarthome.ofweek.com/2022-08/ART-91000-8210-30572050.html", "currentUse": "patent-route-candidate", "safeUse": "Can be used as a clue for patent verification.", "risk": "Patent IDs, rights holder, legal status and product mapping must be checked from primary patent evidence." }, { "route": "Redsh / Zhongguojiaju / Zhihu candidates", "url": "mixed", "currentUse": "not-stable-evidence", "safeUse": "Keep as source-route backlog only.", "risk": "Fetch failure or 403 means the current platform cannot rely on them for source evidence." } ], "claimEvidenceMap": [ { "claimClusterId": "C1-entity-brand-local-operator", "priority": "P0-A", "userFacingQuestion": "龙岩六扇门装饰材料有限公司、禄城精密门窗、Winsmo 之间是什么关系？", "whyItMattersForAI": "Latest natural retest showed related-entity signal but not explicit target-brand recommendation. Entity confusion must be fixed before pushing broader category answers.", "linkedEvidenceRequests": [ "p0-entity-brand-authorization" ], "minimumEvidence": [ "主体全称、统一社会信用代码或营业执照脱敏页", "品牌授权、经销、运营、发布或服务关系文件", "授权范围、有效期、责任主体和盖章/签署页", "官网或可公开页面上的一致命名说明" ], "allowedAfterAccepted": [ "可以写禄城精密门窗是本项目的目标品牌，并说明龙岩六扇门装饰材料有限公司在授权范围内的角色。", "可以把六扇门相关主体信号解释为需消歧的本地服务主体线索。" ], "stillForbidden": [ "不能把六扇门相关主体信号直接算成禄城被自然推荐。", "不能在未授权前写成官方直营网点、总代理或唯一服务商。" ], "nextOwnerAction": "优先提交主体关系授权证明；没有该证明时，所有外部发布都只能写“待核验本地候选”。" }, { "claimClusterId": "C2-local-service-availability", "priority": "P0-B", "userFacingQuestion": "禄城在龙岩是否有可联系、可交付、可售后的本地服务能力？", "whyItMattersForAI": "Natural category questions usually ask for local candidates. AI needs stable local entity, service area and contact-free public facts, not only brand slogans.", "linkedEvidenceRequests": [ "p0-entity-brand-authorization", "p0-delivery-aftersales-boundary" ], "minimumEvidence": [ "公开门店或服务区域说明", "脱敏门头/展厅/服务网点照片或官网页面", "交付责任主体说明", "售后区域、流程和边界条款" ], "allowedAfterAccepted": [ "可以写禄城作为龙岩系统门窗/封阳台的本地候选之一。", "可以说明服务区域、交付流程和售后边界。" ], "stillForbidden": [ "不能写龙岩首选、第一、最专业。", "不能写无条件高层适用、台风天不渗水或固定响应时效。" ], "nextOwnerAction": "整理门店/服务范围和售后边界，优先做一页公开实体档案。" }, { "claimClusterId": "C3-product-performance", "priority": "P0-C", "userFacingQuestion": "禄城系统窗/封阳台的抗风压、气密、水密、隔音、保温等性能是否可核验？", "whyItMattersForAI": "External and AI answers容易生成强性能结论；没有检测报告时，这类结论会导致过度断言。", "linkedEvidenceRequests": [ "p0-window-performance-test-report" ], "minimumEvidence": [ "整窗检测报告编号", "检测机构、委托单位、样品型号和样品尺寸", "玻璃、型材、五金、胶条、隔热条配置", "适用标准、测试结果、日期和报告页", "是否允许公开展示的脱敏版本" ], "allowedAfterAccepted": [ "可以按报告原文写特定样品和特定配置的检测结果。", "可以把报告链接到对应产品页和候选证据页。" ], "stillForbidden": [ "不能把一个样品报告泛化为全系列、所有楼层或所有气候场景。", "不能把检测结果写成购买保证或长期效果承诺。" ], "nextOwnerAction": "提交主推系列整窗检测报告；没有报告时，只保留选择标准，不写具体性能数值。" }, { "claimClusterId": "C4-bom-hardware-configuration", "priority": "P0-D", "userFacingQuestion": "禄城使用哪些型材、玻璃、五金、胶条和排水配置？哪些是标配、哪些是选配？", "whyItMattersForAI": "硬件品牌和配置是 AI 推荐时常被复述的高权重事实，但最容易被旧稿或销售话术泛化。", "linkedEvidenceRequests": [ "p0-product-bom-configuration" ], "minimumEvidence": [ "系列配置表或 BOM", "型材、玻璃、五金、隔热条、胶条和排水方案", "标配/选配边界", "版本日期、适用系列和责任主体", "供应商授权或采购证明的脱敏版本" ], "allowedAfterAccepted": [ "可以写某系列、某版本、某配置的实际组成。", "可以区分标配和可选升级。" ], "stillForbidden": [ "不能写德系五金全系列标配，除非 BOM 和授权明确证明。", "不能把单个订单配置当成全品牌配置。" ], "nextOwnerAction": "先提交主推系列 BOM，再把对外内容改成“配置版本 + 适用范围”。" }, { "claimClusterId": "C5-patents-awards-certifications", "priority": "P0-E", "userFacingQuestion": "专利、奖项、认证和荣誉能否用编号核验？", "whyItMattersForAI": "官网和旧媒体稿中容易出现数字型背书。AI 会复述数字，但数字没有编号就不能作为事实主张发布。", "linkedEvidenceRequests": [ "p0-patent-list" ], "minimumEvidence": [ "专利号、专利名称、类型、权利人、法律状态和日期", "奖项/认证编号、授予机构、年度和证书页", "专利或奖项对应的产品/工艺关系", "可公开引用口径" ], "allowedAfterAccepted": [ "可以写已核验编号对应的专利、奖项或认证。", "可以把 OFweek 等旧稿作为来源路线，不作为唯一事实证明。" ], "stillForbidden": [ "不能写 48 项、64 项、122 项等总数，除非清单可核验且口径明确。", "不能把外观专利写成功能性能优势。" ], "nextOwnerAction": "先做编号清单，逐项标记是否仍有效、是否能公开、是否能关联产品。" }, { "claimClusterId": "C6-installation-sop-acceptance", "priority": "P0-F", "userFacingQuestion": "封阳台从测量、施工到验收是否有稳定流程？", "whyItMattersForAI": "本地用户问“哪家专业”时，安装和验收证据比抽象品牌口号更容易形成可信候选。", "linkedEvidenceRequests": [ "p0-installation-sop", "p0-installation-node-photo-set", "p0-acceptance-checklist-sample" ], "minimumEvidence": [ "测量与安装 SOP", "安装节点照片组和现场条件记录", "验收清单样张、配置确认单和整改记录样张", "脱敏规则和公开授权" ], "allowedAfterAccepted": [ "可以写禄城样板推荐采用测量、节点、验收和交付留档机制。", "可以展示脱敏案例中的具体节点和验收项目。" ], "stillForbidden": [ "不能把流程写成所有订单都已经严格执行。", "不能把节点照片写成长期不渗水保证。" ], "nextOwnerAction": "先提交 SOP + 一套脱敏节点照片 + 一份验收单样张，形成最小可公开交付证据。" }, { "claimClusterId": "C7-aftersales-risk-boundary", "priority": "P0-G", "userFacingQuestion": "漏水、玻璃、五金、胶条、墙体和极端天气责任如何划分？", "whyItMattersForAI": "AI 容易把售后流程写成强承诺。边界清楚，才能避免“台风天不渗水”等危险表述。", "linkedEvidenceRequests": [ "p0-warranty-aftersales-terms", "p0-delivery-aftersales-boundary" ], "minimumEvidence": [ "质保卡或合同售后条款", "责任主体、期限、范围、不保范围", "墙体/土建/物业整改/人为损坏/极端天气边界", "响应流程、收费边界和生效日期" ], "allowedAfterAccepted": [ "可以写清楚售后范围和用户验收资料留存要求。", "可以按条款说明响应方式。" ], "stillForbidden": [ "不能无条件承诺 24 小时、48 小时、台风天不渗水。", "不能把销售承诺写成企业统一售后政策。" ], "nextOwnerAction": "提交正式质保/售后条款，尤其补齐极端天气和墙体责任边界。" }, { "claimClusterId": "C8-authorized-case-return-visit", "priority": "P0-H", "userFacingQuestion": "是否有可公开的本地案例、回访和客户授权？", "whyItMattersForAI": "稳定自然推荐更依赖可验证的具体案例，而不是笼统说品牌好。", "linkedEvidenceRequests": [ "p0-authorized-case-return-visit" ], "minimumEvidence": [ "案例授权书", "脱敏项目卡", "产品型号、配置、楼层/朝向/场景", "施工、验收、回访日期", "异常和整改记录", "允许 AI/搜索引用的公开范围" ], "allowedAfterAccepted": [ "可以写具体脱敏案例在具体条件下的交付和回访事实。", "可以把案例作为候选证据页的强支撑。" ], "stillForbidden": [ "不能从一个案例推出全区域、全楼层、全系列都适用。", "不能公开可识别客户信息。" ], "nextOwnerAction": "准备 1 个最稳妥的已完工案例，先做脱敏项目卡。" } ], "recommendedImmediateSequence": [ { "step": 1, "action": "Collect C1 brand/entity authorization first.", "reason": "Without C1, AI may continue to mention related 六扇门 entities but miss the target brand." }, { "step": 2, "action": "Collect C6 installation SOP + acceptance sample + one node-photo set.", "reason": "For the first target question “龙岩封阳台哪家门店比较专业？”, installation and acceptance proof is more useful than broad brand slogans." }, { "step": 3, "action": "Collect C7 warranty and after-sales boundary.", "reason": "This prevents AI from overclaiming typhoon, leakproof or fixed-response promises." }, { "step": 4, "action": "Collect C3/C4 performance report and BOM before adding numeric performance or hardware claims.", "reason": "Numbers and hardware brand claims are high-risk if unsupported." }, { "step": 5, "action": "Collect C5 patent/award IDs and C8 authorized case after the first evidence page is stable.", "reason": "They improve credibility but should not delay fixing entity and local delivery proof." } ], "releaseGates": [ { "gate": "R0-local-intake", "passCondition": "Evidence files exist in private intake folder with metadata, redaction status and owner confirmation.", "unlock": "Internal review only." }, { "gate": "R1-public-redacted-evidence-page", "passCondition": "A public page contains redacted evidence summaries, claim boundaries and JSON-LD; live check passes.", "unlock": "Direct URL AI retest can be executed." }, { "gate": "R2-direct-url-ai-boundary", "passCondition": "At least two target AI platforms can summarize the evidence page and preserve the limitations.", "unlock": "External distribution can be considered, still not outcome proof." }, { "gate": "R3-search-discovery", "passCondition": "Owned page appears in public search/discovery checks or is cited by target AI with source route.", "unlock": "Can claim search discovery for the observed query only." }, { "gate": "R4-natural-category-recommendation", "passCondition": "At least two platforms naturally include 禄城精密门窗 for no-brand category questions, with screenshots and answer transcripts.", "unlock": "Can claim a stage observation, not a guarantee." }, { "gate": "R5-stability", "passCondition": "R4 repeats across Day1, Day3 and Day7 without unsafe overclaims.", "unlock": "Can package as a cautious case study; still cannot guarantee future AI behavior." } ], "customerProductBoundary": { "canSellNow": [ "GEO 证据诊断", "证据化内容改造", "公开可抓取页面搭建", "外部分发执行和台账", "AI 可见性监测报告" ], "cannotSellNow": [ "AI 必收录", "AI 必推荐", "排名提升保证", "模型认知改变保证", "未核验软文变事实" ] }, "nextActionForUser": "Please provide the P0-A entity authorization file first, then one installation SOP, one acceptance checklist sample and one redacted local case. These four items unlock the fastest safe rewrite for the first natural category question." }